Author Archives: James_Hamilton

Some comments on the Cambridge Energy analysis of future oil supplies

Most pundits had one of two reactions to the recent analysis by Cambridge Energy Research Associates about the prospects for global oil supplies over the next five to fifteen years. Some analysts took the CERA report as confirmation that concerns about peaking world oil production have been misplaced. Others dismissed the CERA findings as completely without merit. I would urge anyone who had either of these two reactions to take a second look at some of the issues.

Continue reading

Is there a danger that the Fed will fall behind the inflation curve?

Both Macroblog and Capital
Spectator
raise the prospect today that rising long-term yields might mean that the Fed
waited too long before trying to stamp out the cinders of an incipient inflation fire. I would
suggest instead that the increase in long-term yields over the last few months is the natural
development that we expect to see in a situation of Fed tightening and has little to do with
inflationary expectations.

Continue reading

Peak oil for skeptical economists

I earlier
attempted
to explain some basic economic perspectives on oil depletion to those who usually
think about the issue from the vantage point of other disciplines. Now I’d like to attempt the
no less perilous task of carrying water the other way across the street, describing to
economists who may find themselves skeptical of the claims made about “peak oil” what I regard
to be some useful insights from geologists and engineers to which some of us have perhaps paid
insufficient attention. As a skeptic and an economist myself, perhaps I’m qualified for that
mission.

Continue reading