A Fed Inflation Credibility Index under Trump

Using 5 year ahead inflation expectations from the Michigan survey, not so much erosion in Trump 1.0. Trump 2.0 so far is another story.

Figure 1: Bordo-Siklos measure of Inflation Credibility (blue). Higher values indicate less credibility; assumes CPI target consistent with 2% PCE deflator target is 2.45%. Light orange highlight indicates Trump Administrations. Source: Michigan Survey and author’s calculations.

In a previous post, I used the NY Fed’s measure to calculate the Bordo-Siklos index; at the moment only the January observation is available for that dataset.

And as an indicator of the tails, here’s the 75 percentile expectation, minus 2.45 percentage points.

Figure 2: 75%ile of expected 5 year inflation minus 2.45% (blue). Higher values indicate less credibility; assumes CPI target consistent with 2% PCE deflator target is 2.45%. Light orange highlight indicates Trump Administrations. Source: Michigan Survey and author’s calculations.

 

One thought on “A Fed Inflation Credibility Index under Trump

  1. Macroduck

    When it comes to the thinking of the general public, Fed credibility is probably not a big deal for the formation of inflation expectations. Market participants and economists track the Fed. The public doesn’t.

    Inflation expectations are largely a reflection of past inflation, backward looking. To the extent that confidence is an issue, it’s probably a vague sort of confidence in outcomes, not in particular institutions. That’s why Republicans and Democrats see the inflatio outlook so differently.

    We’ve had a long period of low inflation, followed by a couple of years of higher inflation. We have headlines about the inflationary effects of tariffs, deportations and bird flu. We have some food prices that have risen substantially. These, I would think, have a greater influence on the inflation expectations of the general public than the felon-in-chief’s plans for the Fed.

    That doesn’t mean the rapist-in-chief’s plans don’t matter. Piling tariffs, deportations, a weak response to bird flu, expansionary fiscal policy and default on Treasury debt* on top of a loss of Fed independence looks like a formula for persistent higher inflation.

    * At its core, any Mar-el-Lago plan, whatever the details, amounts to default on Treasury debt.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *