“Trump’s pick for BLS commissioner suggests suspending the monthly jobs report”

From CNN today:

“Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,” he told Fox Business. “Major decision-makers from Wall Street to D.C. rely on these numbers, and a lack of confidence in the data has far-reaching consequences.”

BLS does calculate a CENSUS of data, available quarterly. It’s called The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. This series is accurate. It’s released quarterly. So Dr. Antoni presumably suggests dispensing with the monthly jobs report, and in order to save money, can just rely on the QCEW. Here’s what the QCEW looks like right now, compared to the CES monthly series (as revised).

Figure 1: Nonfarm payroll employment, July release (bold dark blue), June release (light blue), Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) covered employment, n.s.a. (red). Source: BLS via FRED, BLS.

In fact, the NFP series use as input for revisions the QCEW data, as well as other administrative data. The astute observer will note that QCEW data is only reported up to December 20245.

I believe we will get Q1 QCEW data in about a month. So for data up to 2025Q1, we will get it about 6 months after the fact. Revisions to QCEW are typically very small. However, it is unclear whether reliance on QCEW data will fix the entire problem, if the aim is to measure all employment (not just that taken up by documented workers in the nonagricultural sector); see discussion referring to Goldman Sachs research here.

There is an alternative series, the Cleveland Fed early benchmark. It can be adjusted to conform to national level NFP, but it too lags. The most recent reported months take at face value the BLS series, so it wouldn’t have solved the problem that Dr. Antoni is referring to (see the most recent report).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 thoughts on ““Trump’s pick for BLS commissioner suggests suspending the monthly jobs report”

  1. Macroduck

    This is the same thing China did with its youth unemployment data when it got ugly. Stop publishing and the bad news doesn’t get into the press.

    Of course, thenext thing that would happen here, as has happened in China, is that analysts look elsewhere for the information clients need. We already have a good many data series to keep us informed of labor market conditions:

    ADP private jobs

    Weekly jobless claims

    Income tax revenue

    Challenger layoff announcements

    (Feel free to add to the list)

    At a guess, the press would shift focus to some or all of these series. These series will deliver news that the felon-in-chief sees as unflattering, reminding the public that the felon has tried to hide bad news from them.

    Perhaps, like China, the felon will try to force our press to become more like China’s, slavishly reporting whatever the government tells them to report. We’re already sliding in that direction.

    Reply
  2. Not Trampis

    There seems to me two reasons for the revisions.
    1) You people release the figures way too early. give it at least another week
    2) If you are involved in largescale deportation then that will affect the labour force

    It would be ironic if this clown takes this position and the USA went into recession

    Reply
  3. James Harold McClure

    I presume he does not want to work that hard. Maybe the HHS Sec. is following this lead as he has cut mRNA research.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to James Harold McClure Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *