Figure 1: Daily economic policy uncertainty (blue), and centered 7 day moving average (red). Source: PolicyUncertainty, accessed 14 Nov 2016, and author’s calculations.
Today’s value (sure to be revised) exceeds that recorded on 9/18/2001, the previous high in the sample running from 1985 to today.
As of today, measured economic policy uncertainty hit 468.
Continue reading
The implication of a (massive) revision to the expected path of government debt relative to baseline is an increase in the slope of the yield curve. Some portion comes from the expectations hypothesis of the term structure, some from an increase in the risk premium. [lecture notes on portfolio crowding out] [lecture notes on expectations hypothesis of term structure]
Figure 1: Yield curve as of 8 November (blue), and 9 November (green). Source: US Treasury.
Here are graphs of employment, industrial production, personal income ex.-transfers, manufacturing and trade sales, and real GDP (five indicators that the NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee has focused on in the past) depicting the state of the macroeconomy, given what we know today, and compared to eight years ago.
Today, we present a guest post written by Jeffrey Frankel, Harpel Professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, and formerly a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
At least Kansas makes Wisconsin look good.
Today we are fortunate to have a guest contribution written by Zidong An (American University) and Prakash Loungani (IMF).
I’ve just finished up the Mundell-Fleming model in my int’l finance course, and ended the section with a discussion of the “International Trilemma”, also known as “the Impossible Trinity”, which states that a given country can at any given time fully achieve only two out of three objectives of exchange rate stability, monetary autonomy, and financial integration (full capital mobility) at a time.
Figure 1: Log coincident index for Missouri (blue), Kansas (red), and US (black), all 2011M01=0. March 2017 observation implied from leading indices. Source: Philadelphia Fed and author’s calculations.
Update: More on Governor Brownback’s information program, here.
That’s the title of an informal panel at the UW La Follette School of Public Affairs on Tuesday. Here are the slides that underpin my presentation.
For now, let the following figure summarize the choices.
Source: “Trump vs Clinton: Polarization & uncertainty,” Research Briefing (Oxford Economics, 19 Sept. 2016) [not online].
The other panelists are Pam Herd, Greg Nemet, Rourke O’Brien, and Tim Smeeding.