Brad Setser says “Ut-Oh”, beating me to the punch on the September trade release, which showed US exports plunging. It’s a post that Paul Krugman rightly expresses some angst upon reading. And now I’m going to add two more reasons to worry (not that I think Setser and Krugman aren’t aware of these points).
Monthly Archives: November 2008
The anomalous fed funds market
Some further thoughts on the bizarre behavior of the interest rate that used to be the core instrument of U.S. monetary policy.
Real Retail Sales
Here’s a picture of 12-month percentage changes in real retail sales. Certainly unprecedented for the current series, not so much when including the previous (more volatile) discontinued series — although you do have to go back to 1980 to see a bigger 12-month drop.
Investment advice for a wild market
Your retirement nest egg might have lost 40% of its value since this summer and 10% the last 2 weeks. What should you do? Here’s the advice I’ve been giving to friends who ask, as well as what I’ve been doing with my own portfolio.
The Consumption Path under Certain Assumptions: Back of the Envelope Calculations
Suppose by 2009Q4, GDP is 0.13% below 2008Q3 levels, real equity wealth is 35.2% below end-June levels, and real nonequity wealth is 6% below end-June levels. Further assume that the real Fed Funds rate remains at 2008Q3 levels (-2.45%). Then, the conditional estimate of 2009Q4 consumption will be 2.16% below 2008Q3 levels. This implies a 3% y/y decline in consumption by 09Q3; the only comparable instance of such a decline is 1951Q3, when consumption declined y/y by 2.3% (all percent calculations in log terms).
Some Consumption Trends Reviewed
There’s been a lot of talk about how consumption will fall in the future — some of it added by myself [0]. I’m trying to fit some regressions now, to make some guesses about how consumption will move in the future, based on guesses about GDP and net wealth. I haven’t got very far, but at the very least, I can share some interesting pictures. Figure 1 depicts nominal shares of services, services and nondurables, and total (i.e., adding in durables) consumption, over the 1967-2008 period.
Update on FDIC guarantee fees
On Saturday I noted that details of the FDIC guarantees of fed funds implemented on October 14 could introduce a substantial wedge between the fed funds target and the effective fed funds rate. Rebecca Wilder argues that this could not be affecting the current effective fed funds rate due to details of the “opt out” provision. Here I provide some further discussion of this point.
China Acts
From Bloomberg:
China Announces 4 Trillion Yuan Economic Stimulus (Update2)
By Li Yanping and Chia-Peck Wong
Nov. 9 (Bloomberg) — China announced a 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) stimulus plan to spur expansion in the world’s fourth-largest economy, helping sustain global growth as the U.S., Europe and Japan teeter on the brink of recession.
The funds, equivalent to almost a fifth of China’s $3.3 trillion gross domestic product last year, will be used by the end of 2010, the Beijing-based State Council said today on its Web site. China will adopt a “pro-active fiscal policy” and pursue a “moderately loose” monetary policy, it said.
The Economic Situation: Some Random Snapshots
The latest employment release was stunning, insofar as the NFP employment figure was far below consensus [0]. Net job loss was 240K, rather than 200K; moreover, September job loss was revised upward by 125K. In addition to Jim’s assessment, some reaction is summarized here. The acceleration in net job loss is depicted in Figure 1.
The new, improved fed funds market
Yet another week of institutional changes that render all those nice macroeconomic texts and professors’ lecture notes obsolete.