That is to say, is Post-Modernist Macroeconomic Policy over?
From Postmodernism:
The March employment figures have almost universally been hailed as evidence of a strong labor market, given how the announced value exceeded expectations, and the fact that previous months values were revised upward (WSJ1, WSJ2, Reuters, Bloomberg; contrarian opinion at Big Picture, Capital Spectator). (Jim Hamilton has already discussed how likely these figures are to be revised, in light of other complementary data.) Without disagreeing, I think it behooves us to consider other ways of looking at the data.
As always, first-rate economic analysis from Fed Chair Ben Bernanke today, and first-rate coverage from Mark Thoma and Kash Mansori, among others.
Macroblog and Calculated Risk had some discouraging graphs yesterday.
Most commentary on the 2006q4 current account balance release focused on the improvement in the overall balance. Little noted is the fact that 2006 is the first year in which the net income category has registered negative.
How does the term spread correlate with recession in other economies?
Are declining capital imports growth rates an indicator of recession?
We’ve added a couple of new features to the sidebar.
Recent data leave me significantly more bearish than I was a month ago.
The equity indices take a dive. Is this in spite of — or because of — the fundamentals?