Chairman Bernanke says it all
Earlier this week, the BLS released new estimates of state employment, based upon Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) data through September 2012. The figures for Wisconsin have been substantially revised upward. As indicated in previous posts [1] [2] , census data had indicated substantially higher nonfarm payroll employment than that derived from surveys.
Is February employment growth overstated due to statistical problems?
We should not forget what costs we incurred in search of weapons of mass destruction.
The Economic Report of the President, 2013, released last Friday, devotes some attention to global rebalancing, a topic that I’ve addressed on a number of occasions. [1] [2]; and this paper. Exchange rate movements are critical, but so too are productivity and wage movements.
The CBO has just released estimates of the cyclically adjusted budget balance (or, specifically, the budget balance without automatic stabilizers). The cyclically adjusted budget balance is a better measure of the fiscal stance. The evolution of this series is interesting.
Additional evidence addressing the question asked by Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers.
The new House budget proposal has just been released. [0] In the section discussing economic effects, I read the following:
An interesting new working paper, “Quarterly GDP Revisions in G-20 Countries,” by Manik Shrestha and Marco Marini, documents the fact that at the end of 2008, statistics understated the true extent of U.S. GDP decline.
I’m dubious, but I will not “pull a Lazear”. Or a Don Luskin for that matter.