From the article:
Officials said the raids targeted known criminals, but they also netted some immigrants without criminal records, an apparent departure from similar enforcement waves during the Obama administration. Last month, Trump substantially broadened the scope of who the Department of Homeland Security can target to include those with minor offenses or no convictions at all.
That’s the title of a new European Central Bank working paper (coauthored with Yin-Wong Cheung (City U HK), Antonio Garcia Pascual (Barclay’s), and Yi Zhang (U. Wisc.)) just released.
From Head and Mayer, “Brands in motion: How frictions shape multinational production”, an examination of how the auto industry fares if Nafta is terminated:
In the end-of-NAFTA scenario, depicted in orange in Figure 7, all three members reduce [auto] production.
[blank space here]
But he asks it at 3AM, and asks General Flynn.
Since the Senate Majority Leader has closed down “the greatest deliberative body in the world” by invoking Rule XIX against Senator Elizabeth Warren, I take the opportunity to share what Mitch McConnell was so afraid to have heard.
A quote:
“Anyone who has used the power of his office as United States Attorney to intimidate and chill the free exercise of the ballot by citizens should not be elevated to our courts.”
Tax reform (DBCFT) will not pay for the wall. A remittances tax will not yield sufficient revenues, except perhaps over many years. What about a tariff?
Economic policy uncertainty as measured by the Baker, Bloom, Davis news-based index is definitely higher than pre-election.
Those are estimated amounts of currency undervaluation, using the Big Mac index and the Penn Effect as of July 2016. Guess which currency is 3.7%, and which currency is 50.2%.
Can we fund the partly see-through wall by taxing worker remittances?