Or, how ignorance sometimes invalidates a critique.
I am always amazed at how often people jump to the most paranoid interpretations. One case in point is this article by Evan Newmark entitled Mean Street: Obama’s Big Fat Fibbing Budget on WSJ’s Deal Journal:
A couple of disappointments in this week’s data.
My views on the short term prospects for GDP growth at home and abroad were little changed (relative to this post) by the information in the March trade release. Goods imports are collapsing, albeit at a slower but still substantial rate, and goods exports are declining, with high volatility.
Here are links to perspectives from others on where the economy stands at the moment.
The Analytical Perspectives of the FY2010 budget have been released. Imbedded in the document are the Administration’s new forecasts placed in the context of newer forecasts from CBO and Blue Chip [text added 12:30] (see the Chapter on Economic Assumptions). They have also provided some insights into the sensitivity of the budget outlook to specific alternate economic scenarios (not something I recall the previous Administration doing, but I might be wrong), as well as coefficients of revenue and expenditure sensitivities (something done in previous Analytical Perspectives).
There are persuasive reasons why we’d be better off today with an inflation rate higher than what we’ve seen over the last six months. But while a uniform expansion that raised all wages and prices by the same amount would be helpful, what the Fed could actually achieve in the present situation may be something less desirable.
Revisions are downward (but getting smaller over time), the growth rate becomes less negative, but hours continue to decline rapidly.
The Labor Department reported today that seasonally adjusted new claims for unemployment insurance fell by 34,000 to 601,000 for the most recent available week, resulting in a reduction of the 4-week average for this series for the fourth consecutive week in a row.
Events, particularly these days, tend to outrun the best laid plans to anticipate research trends. And it might seem that this was true in the case of this conference, sponsored by UCSC’s Santa Cruz Center for International Economics, the Journal of International Money and Finance, and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. The conference was planned last year, at a time when most academic researchers were aware and concerned about the incipient economic slowdown, and whether the major economies would “de-couple”, and in turn how these factors would impact the constellation of global imbalances.
The Collapse in Relation to GDP
In an earlier post, I discussed the startling decline in US imports [0]. Brad Setser has also reported on this phenomenon. This decline is not restricted to the United States, as noted in an OECD report released last week (h/t Torsten Slok):