From Bloomberg:
In light of China’s unfair retaliation, I have instructed the USTR to consider whether $100 billion of additional tariffs would be appropriate under section 301 and, if so, to identify the products upon which to impose such tariffs.
From Bloomberg:
In light of China’s unfair retaliation, I have instructed the USTR to consider whether $100 billion of additional tariffs would be appropriate under section 301 and, if so, to identify the products upon which to impose such tariffs.
Reader Bruce Hall, opining on the impact of mooted Chinese tariffs on US hog and soybean exports.
As with pork, it looks as if the cost of food is going down for Americans as the Chinese bury their citizens in food price increases.
Thanks, Trump!

Source: ino.
That’s HTS code 84799041, on the Section 301 hit list released today. Mr. Trump has the thanks of a grateful Nation for stopping intellectual property theft in this important category.
The entire list is here.
There’s a 30 60 day consultation period. Since around $50 billion of goods is targeted, China will likely impose proportional measures if and when retaliation occurs.

Source: ino.com.
Reader PeakTrader says the fortunes of Minnesota and Wisconsin “began to diverge decade before Walker”. I don’t buy it.
Third release numbers on GDP are out. Growth of Gross Domestic Output — the average of GDP and GDI — is down much more than that of GDP: nearly a percentage point.
Still not the leader of the pack.
Regarding the slowdown in employment growth in February, reader Neil asks:
To what extent could the weakness in February be a payback for the outsized growth in December and January. The three month average for nonfarm growth in Wisconsin looks solid. Also, do you have any thoughts on the average hourly earnings data? Looks like Wisconsin is seeing strong growth over the last year.