I thought it of interest to see what surveys of forecasters indicate about two questions being asked: Is a dollar collapse imminent — Martin Wolf is skeptical, while others [0] are convinced the end is nigh — and is a double dip recession likely? I take a look at the messages conveyed by FX4casts.com and the WSJ October survey of forecasters.
Targeted liquidity operations
During the last two years, the Federal Reserve responded to problems in the financial markets through what I have described as monetary policy using the asset side of the Fed’s balance sheet, replacing its traditional holdings of Treasury securities with a variety of new lending programs and alternative assets. I’ve been taking a look at what effect these operations seem to have had on the problems they were designed to address.
Two Views: Blame It on Beijing Redux, or Joint Determination
From the abstract to Why are we in a recession? The Financial Crisis is the Symptom not the Disease!, by Ravi Jagannathan, Mudit Kapoor, and Ernst Schaumburg:
…We argue that the large increase in the developed world’s labor supply, triggered by geo-political
events and technological innovations, is the major underlying cause of the global macro economic
imbalances that led to the great recession. …
Working harder and harder to keep oil production from falling
The challenges for private oil companies to increase oil production are pretty daunting.
Trade Procyclicality in the Current Recession: The View from the US
Paul Krugman recently characterized the current pace of trade activity as worse than that during the Great Depression. And indeed, Barry Eichengreen and Kevin O’Rourke have been diligent in illustrating how this is the case, most recently in this September VoxEU post. Caroline Freund ([pdf] here) as well as the IMF in its most recent World Economic Outlook (Box 1.1) attribute the sharp drop-off in world trade to high income elasticities, in part associated with the high degree of vertical integration that characterizes the globalized world economy. Below, I want to examine that explanation from the perspective of the US data. This follows up on several of my recent posts on the subject. [0] [1] [2] [3]
Will stimulating nominal aggregate demand solve our problems?
In which I join the ongoing debate on how much we should expect fiscal and monetary stimulus to accomplish.
Guest Contribution: The Wisconsin Foreclosure and Unemployment Relief Plan (WI-FUR)
By Morris A. Davis
Today, we’re fortunate to have Morris A. Davis, Assistant Professor of Real Estate and Urban Land Economics at University of Wisconsin School of Business, as a guest contributor.
Research by economists inside the Federal Reserve system have shown that two events typically lead homeowners to default on their mortgage (see here). First, the value of the house must be less than the value of the mortgage (“under water”). This is necessary but not sufficient (see here). Second, homeowners must experience a significant disruption and loss of income. The available data suggest there might be a big increase in foreclosures in the immediate future. Zillow estimates that 22 percent of the 50 million homeowners with mortgages are currently under water; unemployment rates are high and are expected to remain high for the next two years.
“W” and the Stimulus Package in Perspective
In the wake of some recent economic reports, most prominently the employment report, there’s some discussion of how the recovery is in doubt [1], possibly leading to a “W”, or double dip, [2]. Anxieties focus on 2010 or possibly 2011. I think, in retrospect, such worries cast the criticisms of the stimulus bill in a different light than just a few months ago.
Not much of a V
The latest auto and employment numbers paint a picture of an economic recovery that remains tepid and potentially fragile.
The Dollar in Doubt?
I’ve found it puzzling that there’s all this talk about the prospects for the dollar, in the wake of the G-20 meetings, and more recently World Bank President Zoellick’s comments about the primacy of the dollar as a reserve currency. My puzzlement arises from the fact that many of the concerns now being voiced have been voiced before.