Relative to before.
Source: CBO, Budget and Economic Outlook, April 2018 via Kaplan/NYT.
these estimates include macro feedback effects (i.e., dynamic scoring). So much for tax cuts paying for themselves (if anybody ever really believed that).
Relative to before.
Source: CBO, Budget and Economic Outlook, April 2018 via Kaplan/NYT.
these estimates include macro feedback effects (i.e., dynamic scoring). So much for tax cuts paying for themselves (if anybody ever really believed that).
I’ve seen the argument that China’s tariffs on soybeans will have no effect because the soybeans will be relabeled so that US soybeans go to Europe, and soybeans that previously went to Europe go to China, evading Chinese tariffs on US soybeans. John Cochrane makes this point. This seems to have surface appeal in a world where transport costs are zero, and there are no set-up costs to establishing new trading links. Still, I sensed that this conclusion must rest on some assumptions, including for instance infinitely elastic supply. I decided to investigate further.
From Bloomberg:
In light of China’s unfair retaliation, I have instructed the USTR to consider whether $100 billion of additional tariffs would be appropriate under section 301 and, if so, to identify the products upon which to impose such tariffs.
Reader Bruce Hall, opining on the impact of mooted Chinese tariffs on US hog and soybean exports.
As with pork, it looks as if the cost of food is going down for Americans as the Chinese bury their citizens in food price increases.
Thanks, Trump!
Source: ino.
That’s HTS code 84799041, on the Section 301 hit list released today. Mr. Trump has the thanks of a grateful Nation for stopping intellectual property theft in this important category.
The entire list is here.
There’s a 30 60 day consultation period. Since around $50 billion of goods is targeted, China will likely impose proportional measures if and when retaliation occurs.
Source: ino.com.